After 13 years, seven-time winner of the Tour de France Lance Armstrong decided to come clean about doping, a little too late.
Armstrong did a two-part interview with Oprah Winfrey on Jan. 16, giving his side of the story. In June, the U.S. Anti Doping Agency charged Armstrong with using illegal performance-enhancing drugs and stripped him off all seven Tour de France wins and a lifetime ban from any competition following the USADA code.
I could care less about his confession because, let’s face it, the truth had been out for months. It was just a matter of time before he finally admitted it.
Let’s get real for all the people who were surprised by the confession. The Union Cyclist International had accepted the USADA decision to strip the wins and ban him for life. They wouldn’t do that if the evidence wasn’t there to support the accusation.
What I wanted was the story, the nitty-gritty details. How did he do it? Who knew? How many people knew? But to my great disappointment, Armstrong was tight lipped about all of the above. I can respect the whole “I don’t want to name names. I just want to talk about me” attitude, but that doesn’t mean I’m happy about it.
He was very calm and collected throughout the interview until he talked about leaving Livestrong and telling his kids the truth. That to me was when I truly did feel sorry for him. I don’t believe he should be allowed to compete again, but I think he should still be a part of Livestrong, a nonprofit organization that provides support for people affected by cancer.
He may have cheated, but he did beat cancer and go on to compete again, even if the only way he won was by using performance-enhancing drugs.
What I saw in the interview was a man who saw that everything had fallen apart. He was accepting that he made his bed, and, now, he has to lie in it.
Tim Justice • Jan 31, 2013 at 8:08 am
I want to speak, for just a minute, as someone who defended Lance until his admission to come clean. I did so not out of disbelief of the mountain of evidence, but out of belief in due process rather than convicting Armstrong in the court of public opinion, even if the evidence seemed daunting.
I agree; Lance’s admission came too late. Had he been a standup guy at the beginning (or even at the “whoops, I got caught” moment that became apparent six months ago), I would have been the first to defend the guy. I understand how the pressure to perform can lead a person to compromise their principles.
But what Lance did was unconscionable. Not only did he watch as the peloton fell, one by one, but he ATTACKED. And he did so viciously. What will hinder Lance’s intended road to redemption is the fact that he aggressively targetted his accusers rather than calmly taking the “haters gotta hate” route.
Lance’s problem is not doping. Lance’s problem is an intensely egotistical outlook on life that believes in winning by throwing your opponents under the bus. I defended Lance when the final shoe hadn’t dropped; now that it has, he deserves every bit of the scorn (and lawsuits) that will no doubt be heaped on him.
Janet • Jan 31, 2013 at 7:31 am
You *could’t care less
guillaume bechet • Jan 31, 2013 at 7:26 am
Pathetic article yes he beat cancer so did my 10 year old niece .To say he should be part of livestrong really proves to me the ignorance of our culture.He ruined people lives cheating all his sporting career and yes that is before he was diagnosed with cancer.
He is the Bernie Madoff of sports so wake up to reality before we start forgiving everyone .